Five misconceptions about landlord insurance

There are plenty of misconceptions floating about concerning landlord insurance.

Here are five common ones doing the rounds.

Read on to sort the fact from fiction.

Ever wondered where some of the ‘facts’ about landlord insurance have come from?

So do we!

Sometimes we are left scratching our heads about some of the misconceptions we hear, but when we start to hear the same oddities more frequently, we know it’s time to set the record straight.

Let’s look at these five:

Insurance policies need to run in line with a tenancy cycle

If a landlord thinks they only need insurance when they have a tenant in their rental, they best have another thing!

Yes, many of the most common risks that landlords face and insure against occur when they have a tenant in the property, like accidental damage or loss of rent.

But there are other risks that landlord insurance covers that aren’t tenant-related.

Risks like damage from perils like fire, storm, flood, cyclone, theft, or impact.

These can occur at any time, whether a tenant is in occupancy or not.

And if a landlord waits to take out cover when they have a tenant installed and one of these perils happens in the meantime, they will find themselves without cover and potentially face a huge damage bill (there have been far too many incidents when damage is so extensive that a total loss is incurred, such as fire razing a home).

And speaking of potentially life-shattering bills, there is also legal liability.

Regardless of whether there is someone occupying a rental or not, the risk that someone could be injured or their property damaged when they are on the premises, still exists.

Just think about it.

What happens if a potential tenant comes to inspect the property and falls down the stairs because of a dodgy handrail?

Or did the agent you have checking in on the property have the carport fall on their car?

Or did the electrician repairing the wiring come with a cropper off the roof because they weren’t told the tiles were in bad repair?

Or did the meter reader slip over on a wet verandah?

As the owner, you can be held liable for their losses.

And liability claims can stretch into hundreds of thousands of dollars (sometimes, millions!).

To be protected, a landlord needs to have insurance cover in place from the day they become the owner of the investment property until the day they cease being the owner.

Taking out insurance to coincide with the tenancy cycle is simply too fraught.

There is no cover while the property is between tenancies

Is a rental covered by insurance if it is vacant or not? It depends.

So long as a valid policy (e.g. one that is paid and in-date) is in place, the premises are generally protected between tenancies (between the time that one tenant moves out and another moves in).

However it is important to know what the property is protected against.

For example, if there are no tenants, the property is not covered for tenant-related matters like loss of rent or tenant damage (for these to be covered, there needs to be a tenancy agreement in place, so if you have family or friends staying at the property without a lease such losses are not covered).

This doesn’t mean the landlord can’t lodge a claim for such losses incurred because of the previous tenant (e.g. breaks a lease and owes rent or has damaged the property) though.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *